US presidential election 2016 and the fate of the agenda of the corporate capital

Stein/Baraka the only pro-people candidates in the race

US presidential election 2016 and the fate of the agenda of the corporate capita

US presidential election results are around the corner. Two years of hard campaigning from 4 political parties running for election as well as countless liberal propaganda agents would fall finally silent, giving a much needed break to the minds and ears of people across the world. Having a logical viewpoint on what is important to the human population is vital to the survival of the global desire to resist the Anglo-Saxon world order that has enslaved the entire world on behalf of big money.

Progressives worldwide have for a long time worked for and talked about a system change. From climate change to issues like globalization, governance and economy we demand a total shift of the dominant paradigm and a system change. The US have been slowly but steadily losing its super power status. Those who hold power in the Judeo-Christian supremacist global power structure over life and death of all the other earth citizens have been busy laying out the groundwork for the next stage in transforming their ways and means to keep their power base.

Today global capitalism is busy moving away from using governments to do their bid to a point where they gain more and more a direct role in governance by taking over the roles of the states. This is as the states has the potential to be control by the people they are elected by and has the risk of becoming impediments to the unrestricted flow of capital. Therefore big corporations needs to have deregulated global political environment where they can manage upcoming challenges. This is one of the primary goals behind TPP, TTIP or even CETA. In Sri Lankas case India Sri Lanka free trade deal called ECTA that is design to fulfill the needs of the capital in South Asia. This fulfills the important need of the US hegemony in the next phase of its corporate induced evolution, removal of accountability to gain full control over the global population. The United States have been bombing, killing, raping and torturing its way to keep the imperial agenda intact for decades. Now in an increasingly multipolar world, the US is facing its natural demise as a super power. Therefore, it is imperative for its political elites and their corporate masters to transform the global power structure into a tool of global capitalism, ensuring the ultimate level of uninterrupted movement of capital. This capital is no longer loyal to the American people. It has have moved away from the point of serving America towards serving the capital itself. The importance of the US presidential elections should be assessed in the context of this bigger picture.

In the United States of America the corporate capitalism is busy taking over the political domain and ensuring more and more of their agenda is taken up by the political leadership. It is very difficult to find a better politician than Hillary Clinton to represent the needs of the capital itself in world politics today. This is in many ways the tipping point of the transformation. However, 2016 is the first major shift in this work towards having their own agent taking over the political leadership from a point where they hijack a natural political leader to do their bidding.

The most shocking revelation in this regards was published by Wikileaks showing Mrs. Clinton telling a group of Brazilian bankers that she intended to build a borderless trade regime in greater Americas, bypassing and violating the national sovereignty of Latin American people. This means she wanted to replace the people’s monopoly on governance and policy with big corporations in the US. The Clintons have been known for their unprecedented support to corrupt crony capitalists. They masterminded one of the most important milestones in this regard known as “the North American Free Trade Agreement” in 1994. They have been playing an instrumental role in converting the US political and military structure into a puppet of their corporate masters. The Controversial Transpacific Partnership (TPP) and the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) are two ongoing efforts to give US corporations more gains and more control over the populations around the world, bypassing elected governments. US governments driven by the corporate agenda are busy making new plans to prevent Asia from gaining economic and political independence to continue the economic enslavement of its people. The level of co-operation between India and USA, and the extreme levels of joint militarization are clear evidence of this.

In general, the question who becomes president of the United States of America, the leading corporate hegemony, has little relevance to the world population enslaved by the Anglo-Saxon world order. In 2008 when most of the educated upper middle class was infected with the Obama syndrome for pretended change, it was clear that the US corporate agenda just got the best PR face it could hope for to intensify their crony capitalist plunder. How Obama became a black face for the white agenda became clear from the way the City group of bank executives came up with 31 US cabinet ministerial positions in 2008, one month before the Election Day. Now the same group who ran the corporate mega operation for Obama is running the campaign for the most corrupt and dangerous US presidential candidate in recent history, Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton. Reading who John podesta is and who else is involved in managing democratic nominees campaign would clear the slightest doubt one might have on the real dark nature of the Clinton campaign.

The significant difference between the 2016 US elections and previous elections is clear. Clinton faced an unprecedented challenge from a self-proclaimed social democrat called Bernie Sanders, who she prevented from getting the nomination by outrightly stealing the victory away from him. It was truly shocking how clinton and there associates in media and democratic national committee worked together with many of the super delegates. The Great Old Party, aka Republican Party this time nominated a total outsider who threatens to bring the Washington system down. It is more accurate to say the Republican establishment was forced by millions of disgruntled Americans to give the nomination to Donald John Trump. Virtually every establishment of the Anglo-Saxon world order has joined the corrupt democratic nominee, Hillary Clinton, against Trump. Name it and they all are in her camp. From the military industrial complex and the big banks to the pharmaceutical industry, everyone is backing her. From those who want to go to war against China and Russia, to those who want to destroy farming communities around the world to allow its GMO producing corporations taking over, they are all there.

There has been no other point of recent US history that we know of where every elitist master has joined hands so nakedly to get their agent elected. Even the Republican Party’s old guard, who is responsible for millions of deaths worldwide, for plunder and enslavement of the masses, abandoned the candidate nominated by their own party. This is the first time in my life that such a grand establishment coalition has been formed.

Everyone at the top is with Hillary, to a point where you lower your own social class if you say that you don't vote for her. Fake arguments about the feminist vote, anti-racism, sexism and social justice to saving the world from fascism are branded as truth only to to force fear and to make people accept her. They are fake because they have little or no relevance in the final picture. Personal character matter little. In any case for those who want to elect the best person with character and political line possible, voting Dr. Stein is the only option. This is why recently some political philosophers come out and started to say that Hillary Clinton is the real danger to the world.

The US media have taken the other two major candidates away from the public spotlight and are busy telling the population which issues are important and whom they should vote for. The only feminist progressive candidate in the race, Mrs. Dr. Gill Stein, is nowhere to be found in any of the mainstream media in the US. She is from the only anti imperialistic Green Party (not the green left) in the western world that condemns and demands a total reset to everything that is wrong about the USA. However, not only do they hide Dr. Stein, they also deny the American public the important discussion of Clinton’s thirst for blood and war worldwide.

It is a very difficult task for people to penetrate the media bombardment and see the bigger picture. The best way to see things clearly is obviously to find out what these candidates represent, who is behind their campaigns. This is why Donald J. Trump got the support of the angry American lower classes that felt disenfranchisement for decades. Like others who understood the gravity of his candidacy and saw him winning the nomination, I was laughed at by pandits who lived in their own world. Throughout the democratic primary I was eagerly watching the campaign of Bernie Sanders. Like others I was convinced that if he would win the nomination, there would be a possibility for a political discussion around the world, particularly in the US, that would recognize the negative impact of the US imperial agenda. My hope was that such an uprising of a public driven political dialogue would help us to envision the dismemberment of the capitalist hegemony that drives the Anglo-Saxon world order. However, the nomination was shamelessly robbed from him and now he is part of the same system he sought to fight by supporting the one candidate who represents corporate America more than anyone else in history.

Unlike Clinton, who appointed a corrupt corporate lobbyist famous for his workings to support the corporate American agenda, Trump has appointed Kellyanne Conwaya as his campaign manager a person who represents the angry Americans and a true anti establishment symbol. However, despite the nature of Trump’s campaign and his communication savviness, there is still a risk that he either loses or will be made to lose. Even if he wins, his non-interventionist foreign policy might not be implemented in a worst-case scenario where it is still easier compared to his main opponent to mobilize support against. However, defeating Clinton by voting Green or Republican would defeat the corporate agenda for the moment. It will lower the risk of increased militarization of the Indian Ocean, the South China Sea and Eastern Europe.

The most important outcome of making Hillary Clinton the runner-up of the 2016 election is to deny the US hegemony its smiling PR face and delay its corporate driven transformation, which would give substantial breathing space for those who want to fight for and create a just world - a world where people’s needs are taken forward, not the needs of the capital. Even if Trump becomes the worst ever president, it would be easier to build alliances against the US hegemony thanks to the way he is perceived around the world and among the ruling elites in the west. However, people who have their heads filled with the propaganda from Clinton camp may still find it difficult to vote for him. If you don’t like any one of the democratic or republican candidates, then don’t vote for them. Vote for the true voice of progressive social development in this year’s US presidential election. Vote for Dr. Stein. If you choose to vote for Clinton, do it, but don’t claim to be pro social justice and progressive, and be ready to take the full responsibility of the blood she would shed, the disability she would trigger, exploitation and enslavement she would push for.

Let’s wait and see what will happen in a few hours. The fate of the Washington establishment was never before at this level of risk. This in itself is an interesting phenomenon to watch.

Electing MS is the greatest foreign policy coup in recent Sri Lankan history by popular will.

By Sanka Chandima Abayawardena

The country seemed to be excited over the reception that President Sirisena received in Japan as media reports started to emerge. There is nothing more exciting for an International Relations person like myself to see Sri Lanka gaining positive global spotlight. However, given the kind of strategic interests of different powers at play over Sri Lanka, it is important to provide a comprehensive yet easy to understand explanation to the public. Such public situational awareness and judgment is an essential element in developing public participation in our foreign policy exercise.  My intention is to provide the public with a simplified understanding away from technical and key words.

There is no doubt that the reception that President Sirisena received in Japan is significant. It shows how much the Western powers (G8 minus Russia) value Sri Lanka in their camp. Sri Lanka as the doorway to any government with ambitions to dominate the Indian Ocean is a very attractive grapefruit. No matter who is in power in Sri Lanka (from Chandrika, Ranil, Mahinda to Sirisena), foreign governments that have strategic interests in maritime trade and naval affairs had their say over our standing in the global structure. The public is well aware of the international power games played during the conflict with the Tamil Tigers. It is the responsibility of the government to use our geostrategic standing in a way that ensures our sovereignty through prosperity.

Therefore it is important to understand what kind of opportunities and risks come with the spotlight that we are getting since January 2015. Sri Lanka is among a group of countries that make up the essential elements of China’s Maritime Silk Road (the single most important initiative in recent history that can shift the balance of power in favour of the Global South). This is the best shot we have to become what we were some centuries ago - the trade and knowledge hub of the Indian Ocean.

Because of its importance, the project ended up dragging the island into an ugly power game played in the region. This is why the change of presidency in January 2015 was influenced by these external powers as much as it was by the public’s will (the public interest is in the opposite end of what the external powers desire). It is a clear indication that some world and regional governments intend to make us an ally to their strategy to keep China cornered, or at least checked. There are great Western and Pacific interests to keep us neutral or part of their camp. Particularly the America-Japan-India and South Korea military alliance to counter Chinese naval and maritime trade is clearly showing signs of wanting to keep Sri Lanka within their realm of influence.

It is our national interest to make Sri Lanka the hub of the Indian Ocean. The economic strength and our foreign policy game would directly affect our future ability to grow as an independent nation. The previous government of President Rajapakse correctly placed us as a strong partner to China’s Maritime Silk Road initiative and developed key infrastructure that can help Sri Lanka to exploit such a beneficial position. Even the public that is highly critical of the nature of his rule, the influence of his sons and certain brothers agrees that these strategic initiatives are to the benefit of the country’s long-term vision of economic stability and growth. His government however didn’t do the minimum required to provide leadership to the foreign ministry. Typically a haven for intellectuality, flexibility and creative skills, the Sri Lankan foreign ministry was similar to a rag tag travel agency and place of experiment for unqualified appointments. As a result the foreign ministry became a haven for failure after failure. In the absence of a comprehensive action plan and lack of incentive for talented experts to do their job, the Sri Lankan foreign policy exercise totally collapsed.

Some in Sri Lanka seem to be promoting the factually incorrect view that after the January 2015 elections, the international community accepted us with much good will and all problems were now solved. Nothing can be further from the truth. After January 2015, the voters gave significant space for foreign powers to maneuver in Sri Lanka, thus allowing them to gain policy influence besides our traditional allies like China, Russia and Pakistan. The public intention was to give room to these powers in order to gain vital breathing space and avoid the immediate threat of international political interference and economic sabotage, as President Rajapakse’s government failed to deliver essential reforms as demanded. While today there is criticism on how China, one of the most important allies of Sri Lanka, is handled so far, and on the mismanagement of the current government, credit should be given to those in the new government who ensure transparency and flexibility in our foreign policy that has already resulted in some mouth sweetening results.

The biggest mistake here would be to assume that we should aim at establishing Sri Lanka as a strong partner for the Western block that sees the Maritime Silk road as a challenge to their neocolonial hegemony. Instead Sri Lanka must further its existing partnerships with the Maritime Silk Road and use China’s massive economic power in order to prepare Sri Lanka to exploit the geo strategic importance of the Indian Ocean, while at the same time showing a more non-aligned face of our foreign policy by allowing a fair maneuvering space for parties like the US, India and general west including G7 who have strategic desires and needs in the region.  

President Sirisena successfully managed to regain positive recognition from the traditional world powers after a period of mistrust towards Sri Lanka. His diplomacy as a statesman will help our country to protect its sovereignty while exploiting our geostrategic location.  Today we are able to move our non-aligned foreign policy into a new era. We can stop destabilization by foreign powers through providing alternatives that don’t threaten our sovereignty.

Through a very successful first 15 months in office, President Sirisena led us to this position with the same bureaucratic capacity as President Rajapakse’s government and thereby greatly fulfilled the Middle Class expectations to change the way we implement our foreign policy.  Today Sri Lanka stands in front of the challenge to become a stabilizing force in the Indian Ocean where all strategic interests can melt and mutually beneficial cooperation can take place. Through a flexible and rigid approach, we must strengthen our relationship with the West and Japan, while at the same time not betray cooperation with our traditional progressive partners in the Global South specially China, Russia Latin America and Africa.  This means that we cannot become a party to any military axis or a market for anyone’s military-industrial complex.

My approximation is that all segments of UPFA are yet to properly understand and work with such a flexible foreign policy agenda. Even if they understand the type of challenge ahead of us, some clearly have other personal agendas dictating their behavior, which has denied the president a vital strength to balance the neoliberal tendencies of the right wing conservatives.

It is of utmost importance for our future existence that the Sri Lankan foreign policy infrastructure is rebuilt from the ground up and kept well oiled by giving it all the skills it needs to strengthen our global standing. This requires a strategy well rooted in the interests of the Global South in order to carefully manage G7’s counter-interests.

The mandate given by the last two elections is to take the country along the agenda set by the populace as they elected President Sirisena. This agenda however is not supposed to have neoliberal tendencies just as it is not supposed to take the path of former President Rajapakse. Given that a change of the current unity government is not realistic yet, all progressive and anti-imperialistic actors must strengthen the path for the agenda they set throughout 2015. The current period of relaxed international pressure must be used for reforming the foreign ministry’s age-old system and strengthen its capacity to make sure it can further the achievements shown as well as making it effective in facing possible future droughts. This includes among other things the introduction of systems to hire the brightest in the country, restructuring, resourcing, as well as allowing greater flexibility to operate.

An important step in strengthening our armory to face our foreign policy challenge is to make Sri Lanka’s governance more transparent and “just” based on participatory democracy, leaving no room for external powers to exploit and manipulate the popular will. Participatory democracy does not mean devolution of powers to ethnicities or religions, but to individual people. Devolution must be secular as well as “just” and not strengthen religious or cultural institutionalization, hence totalitarian control. We must not make the public believe that accusations of alleged humanitarian violations are over. They are far from over, and Sri Lanka must establish a local mechanism to hold the responsible individuals accountable. This again does not mean that LTTE terrorists and those who helped them in their unprecedented carnage get away with crime in order to satisfy external powers. In fact the spotlight and recognition that we gained in the West should be fully utilized to hold LTTE and its partners accountable just as others involved in such acts.

We must also take the opportunity to strengthen our relation with the African, Asian and Latin American nations, just as we build relations with the West. The stronger we will be in diplomacy, the more effective we can build our nation’s role as a balancing force in the Indian Ocean and provide a much needed platform for different geostrategic needs to work together. Until this happens, Sri Lanka’s long-standing dream of becoming the hub of trade and knowledge in the Indian Ocean after 600 years will not become reality. Therefore, we can clearly say Congratulations President Sirisena, But a long way to go.

A new agenda for women’s rights in Sri Lanka: Smash Victoria and her idiots

A new agenda for women’s rights in Sri Lanka: Smash Victoria and her idiots

By Sanka Chandima Abayawardena from Brussels

The rights of people of all genders are a topic of great importance to all civilizations in history, so it also has been an important pivot to the civilization in Sri Lanka for thousands of years. The topic has come up with new life in recent years, as particularly the Sinhalese population started to put greater focus onto learning about their heritage. The generations born after 1956[1] desired the restoration of their heritage, which they felt was lost to outside intervention. Since the year 2000[2], many young people see the need to revive their cultural heritage and uphold their social independence. This new trend has no racial or religious boundaries. In this discussion, finding out about our personal opinions on women rights is very important.

In this discussion we can identify three major groups. (a). Those who misidentify our heritage with Victorian and Christian values introduced by European invaders and aggressively promote a dead Victorian ideal as the new role model for future Sri Lanka; (b) those who support Western supremacy and Colombo-centered feminist groups who mirror European campaigns as a means to seem important and elitist over the larger rural population[3]; (c) those who know the difference between the real Sri Lankan heritage[4] of liberal social values in association with Buddhist and Hindu principles and the nature of our post-Victorian cultural practices today, but want to move forward through a flexible discussion for a modernist feminist agenda that has people’s ownership. Only through a popular movement can we effectively ensure and sustain equality between men and women.

The first group constitutes the majority and is most powerful. The second group is the most supremacist and allows themselves to be used as tools for the larger geo-political agenda to keep Sri Lanka in the Western camp to prevent an Asian revival[5]. I belong to the smallest and least influential third group. However, I have the firm belief that Sri Lanka needs an agenda that is firmly grounded in the mind of our populace and learns from our heritage as one of the most sexually and socially liberal civilizations in the ancient world, instead of an agenda parachuted from on us from outside. We all have read about the rights to property, education, leadership and governance that Sri Lankan women had a long time ago. We know that our economic and political life was not directly run by a religious institution such as in Europe. However, we must not forget that the socio-economic conditions have long been changed, and so have the religious-cultural practices that shape them. Therefore, our generation needs to develop a modernized view on gender rights instead of trying to reestablish cultural practices, which we falsely perceive as pure or authentic in our minds.

The idea that in history men got prominence over women because men used to provide for women and children is utterly wrong and based on a false understanding of our own history. In most societies, women were as active as men in their societies and in many cases women had more power than men. Then however organized religion made it possible for a few men to take power to their hands. From Greek mythology to Hindu practices, women were then treated like sub-humans to keep the power concentrated in a few men from elite classes. Greek men called women “demonic”. You can find similar or worse practices in Islam or in Eastern religions such as in certain schools of Hinduism.

If we truly want to establish equality between people of all genders, we have to demolish these practices based on religious dogma in our cultures and understand that we need to change the power structure of our societies. The baseless discrimination of women is similar in origin to the baseless class divisions in our societies, especially in Hindu and Sinhalese populations. The Sinhala Buddhist population must realize that some of the things that they think are Buddhist and cultural are not Buddhist and Sinhalese at all. 

It is important to understand the impact of the institutionalized church under different European invaders on our opinions. The popular and strong opinion on the sanctity of marriage between a man and a woman can be pointed out as obvious effects. Whatever influence it may be, today large parts of our society think that women are the property of men and their social roles are inferior to men in general. Nothing has been more negatively affected by this view than the political participation of women.  Sexism runs strongly to a level that can only be described as disgusting. The media takes all the effort to improve their ratings by appealing to these popular and discriminative Victorian ideals. One would often find local police officers assuming a Victorian police culture through British imposed laws. It is true that the socialist and Buddhist nature of our government and social system has helped us in some areas and as a result women in Sri Lanka still enjoy considerable freedoms compared to other countries in the region. However, the lack of understanding of the true nature of some of our cultural elements that govern our attitude towards social equity in the current Sinhala, Tamil and Muslim cultures has put a powerful barrier to moving forward towards establishing gender equity.

The elites of these communities and the small but ultra-powerful urban neo-liberals have made no efforts to create a local base for the agenda of gender equity. Meanwhile the religious groups interpret modernity out of their books that are outdated by more than by a millennium. This can be seen in the disturbing attempts to mainstream the Burka for Muslim women or backward opposition to the promotion of contraceptives in the South and in the North.

The Sinhala Buddhist community as the developers of the Sri Lankan civilization must find means to reject outdated religious and Victorian dogma. They must find ways to deal with the crisis of interpretation of what is actually the Sinhala Buddhist heritage of social and sexual relations and why they moved from one of the freest and most liberal communities to the status they are in today. They must understand that Sri Lanka needs to advance their true heritage to suit the modernist need of gender equity. Tamil and Muslim communities must make the same efforts to advance gender equality and reject practices that don’t fit anymore the modern world. They, just like Sinhalese must move away from cultural norms that differentiate between men’s and women’s rights.  No matter how difficult this job may be, it is even more difficult for Muslims, not just because of cultural differences and social pressure being a minority, but also because of the religious pressure put on them by external factors like the US and Saudi Arabia. 

The Muslim population in Sri Lanka, just like everywhere else in the world, faces a challenge of reforming their religious interpretations. Therefore, it is important that they understand that the need for treating men and women equally is not meant as a threat against them. It is only by understanding what we are as a community and what is the true heritage of Sri Lankan culture that we can start developing our own knowledge for a modernist agenda for equality. This is the most effective and sustainable path towards recognizing that people of all genders are human beings with the same rights.  We must refrain from assuming religious and cultural differences in fundamental rights of different people.

We cannot set people free by continuously imposing the discriminative and sexist ideals we have in our heads, which we identify as ours, but are given to us by religious dogma or a foreign occupation. Sri Lanka has a great opportunity to change the status of men and women, now that the connectivity of people and free flow of information is on the rise. It is high time to smash Victoria and her idiots and banish them out to the sea. If we as a country, especially the young people who are the spearhead of the information revolution, can be made aware of and be educated on the three main questions, (1) Who are we, (2) What are we doing now, (3) What should we do for us, the issue of gender equity can come to a peaceful resolution. If we can create such a strong base for our social development to move forward, we will be able to develop a sustainable and stronger society that all people can support and feel part of. My intention is to see this happen. I know that many others out there want the same - to have freedom that can be made ours, not theirs; an agenda that would serve us as a community in a small island nation, not the geo-political interests of regional and global powers who wish to use us in their game in the Indian Ocean.

---

[1] People elect the first Government with true socialist and nationalist tendencies.

[2] The year first people born in to the war started their adulthood who had witness the Indian military intervention, brutality of the conservative governments crack down of leftist insurgency in 1989-1992

[3] Feminist movement in Europe is a result of unprecedented discrimination of women and responds a set of unique issues in society to ensure gender equity. A feminist movement in Sri Lanka should understand the social issues in Sri Lanka and what cultural and social conditions trigger them and address them effectively. While goals of such a movement can be the same as in rest of the world, the strategies at tactical level must be Sri Lankan.

[4] Sri Lanka historically was the complete opposite of the Victorian society which we cherish so much today. At one point level of our Sexual and social freedom was one of the most liberal in the ancient world.

[5] West rules the world because of the dictatorial dominance they maintain in knowledge and development of knowledge in the world. It can be argued today’s feminist movement is a extension of this domination rather than a natural extension of the true global need. This is why we must found our own modernization movement that is grounded.

The change we need, smashing of the white supremacist world order.

The change we need, smashing of the white supremacist world order. 

The only progressives in the west are those who understand that white supremacist world order and its dynamics and effects and actively work to change it. Others, just people who swim in shallow water.

When will this world of white supremacy would fell!
It is astonishing how the story of Human Civilization is distorted to support the western world domination. For example, After Moors were killed and Spain was conquered by Christians kings, they burn millions of Arabic books. Some of them were translated and triggered Renaissance. Even the most accurate version of documentaries says Arabs got their knowledge from Alexandria and Alexandria got it from the Greeks. So Renaissance was technically the result of European knowledge.
What bull shit version of history. So nothing exist before Greeks then? What about Persia? What about China, India and Sri Lanka.
They shamefully ignore how Persians and Asian civilizations created knowledge that Arabs developed and Europe robbed.
Why there is no understanding on the western version of world history is absolutely false, support white supremacy all over the place?
When will the world would see the global power structure is racist, and based on barbaric rules design to keep a particular Human subspecies on top of a murderous pyramid of power over the majority?

If Not Bernie, It should be Trump!

I was wondering,

I'm Sick and tired of two things, 1. US presidential election, 2. people outside US act like whats good for the Hegemony is good for the world and repeat the arguments that US media teaches them. 


I will never be able to live with Hilary 2016, Why? She will use Military force to compensate the traditional threat pose by multi polar world to the US Hegemony. She will also expand what she started (Killing people and call it a victory for HR) as the Secretary of State. In This context She is more dangerous than Trump as she will trigger less global outrage against US. 

So If US hegemony cant get to the soft hands of Bernie, its better to have it on some one who would help rest of the world to mobilize against the US hegemony, (In a way Bush did in his last years). Hilary will also mainstream the corporate globalization and provide it with firm ideological grounds to operate in to perpetuity. She would also provide a sheep's clothing to the real wolf underneath. 

This is why I Cant live with Hilary 2016. So If US Hegemony is not going to the soft hands of Bernie, Then It should go for trump. Why, If we cant have a softer Hegemony then its better to have a Hegemony that would trigger a global mobilization for increasing speed of the Hegemonic downfall.